Nerman Fatic vs Martin Blasko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Blasko analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Martin Blasko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Blasko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 49.16% of points on their second serve, while Blasko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 44.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blasko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 59.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blasko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 49.23% of matches played (W/L 32/ 33), with Blasko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Blasko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 66/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Blasko has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 2 times and Blasko being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Blasko winning 1. The last match between Fatic and Blasko was at the Turkey F3, 19-01-2016, First, Hard with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Blasko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fatic winning 1 times and Blasko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Blasko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.34 while Blasko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blasko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 37.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blasko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
219
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
601
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
57% (343-259)
Career Total W/L
55% (76-61)
38% (10-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nerman Fatic vs Martin Blasko For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fatic VS Blasko
stats | Nerman Fatic | Martin Blasko |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 30 | 20 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
DFs Total | 3 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 0:48:30 | 0:48:30 |
1st Serve % | 62% (48/78) | 76% (45/59) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (34/48) | 47% (21/45) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 50% (7/14) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 18% (2/11) |
Return Points W% | 53% (31/59) | 41% (32/78) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Martin Blasko
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
5-7 7-6(6) 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Martin Blasko |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (10/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (26/34) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (270/303) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
Aces Total | 112 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.18 | 0 |
DFs Total | 51 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:39:53 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 311.15 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (1095/1689) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (752/1095) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (292/594) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (52/140) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (625/1735) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 39% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (9/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Nerman Fatic
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
10
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
84)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Martin Blasko Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Bogdan Ionut Apostol
Player
Martin Blasko
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
10
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Martin Blasko
Player
Cihan Akay
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Blasko
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve %
55%
(
11 of
20)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
30
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Blasko
Player
Marek Semjan
60%
(
76 of
127)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
37%
(
47 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
104)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Laslo Djere
Player
Martin Blasko
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Fatic Vs Blasko Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fatic are available here and Blasko photos here.